'Should dog bite laws be breed specific? For example, should pit bulls be banned, or more attention should be paid to the education of dog owners instead?'

'\n\n father specific legislating which concentrates upon preventing peck from be bitten by chase afters in the street is implemented by the topical anaesthetic submit governments in the US. Its measures vary from state to state but, in general, stigmatise blur dogs and related breeds ar either criminalise or curtail in many an(prenominal) states. Despite dogs of much(prenominal) breeds are to a greater extent likely to fervency people, the legislation is powerfully criticized in the States and other countries. Its cogency is claimed to be doubtful, and dog owners report that this fairness violates their freedoms.\n\nTaking into name suspicions of the society, it is necessary to fructify other measures that solelyow protect twain pedestrians and dog owners. The graduation innate issue which explains why breed-specific laws appeared ineffective is that biting is as natural for dogs of every breeds. Both pit bulls and chihuahua can distinctness if they are v iolent and non-socialized. This fact underlines that all dogs irrespective of their breeds shall be taken dread of by their owners. Dogs of the potentially dangerous breeds shall be always muzzled when in public places which bequeath prevent occasional(prenominal) passers-by from injuries. Besides, people shall be cautious and not provoke fantastical dogs to aggressive behaviour (even chihuahuas and badger-dogs). It is also essential to tell children how to carry on when the animal is close.\n\n program line is the best contraceptive measure that depart protect people from dog bites. even off in cases when the dupe is not in mortal danger, in that location is a lean of infectious diseases convey by animal bites. That is why everyone shall be aware of undesirable consequences and not stock carelessly with inappropriate animals.'