Introduction to Conflict Resolution Essay

Conflict is one of the drivers for improved police squad performance. Managed tumefy, fighting can lead to better decisions, more creative ideas and higher(prenominal) quality output from the team. Managed spoiltly, it can stop teamwork and hinder individuals from achieving their personal goals. (Conflict law of closure For Team Members (n. d. ) taken from TeamTechnology. co. uk http//www. teamtechnology. com. uk/conflictresolution. html) The assignment presents a situation in which a conflict occurred and what happened. Also, the assignment discusses on what should take aim been done and which was the wronged referencey.The conflict presented is amid the cardinal ag ag aggroups of the recruits that are undergoing training in the VP-92 navy P-3 squadron. The recruits were divided into both groups for a mock designate struggle mission one was responsible for identification of the targets and informing the other group about the location of the targets and the split seco nd group was supposed to glint the targets. The problem arose when the area surrounding the vessel was foggy and the targets could non be identify clearly by the setoff group. Hence, the second group, whose performance was dependent on the depression group, could non amaze and shoot the targets.This was followed by an argument and a conflict between the both groups which was resolved by the officers. Then the writer says which side he would have chosen and why and what actions he would have taken. The conflict, however sm entirely it was, was factual and both the parties were justified and neither one is to be blamed. Title inlet to Conflict Resolution Part I The Organization The organisation that is to be discussed below is VP-92. It is navy P-3 Squadron where the navy conducts its operations. The navy besides provides training to its juvenile recruits.A Navy is the branch of a countrys soldiers forces principally designated for naval warfare, namely lake- or ocean-bo rne combat operations and tie in functions. It includes operations conducted by surface vessels (ships), submarine vessels, and seaborne aviation, as well as ancillary support, communications, training, and other fields recent developments have include space-related operations. (en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Navy) Part II The Conflict The conflict at VP-92 was between cardinal groups of the marine crew at an assignment of mock target attack mission.One group, consisting of five crew-members, was responsible for identifying targets to be hit, while the other group, also consisting of five crew men, was responsible for hitting the targets in the assigned target areas to them. The conflict arose when the group that was supposed to identify targets could not identify the targets to be hit on age out-of-pocket to the fog and mist that was blurring their visibility and making it hard for them to locate their targets. As the targets could not be place on time, the group that was supposed to strike the targets could not perform their duties on time.As a result a conflict arose between the two groups. Basically the strikers work depended on the identifiers and the second group could not perform well because identifiers had a problem with identifying the targets. The strikers could not justly strike their targets and their aim was wrong and not rightly focused. Hence, they put all the blame of their bad performance on the first group. Part third Choose a Side I choose to be on the side of the group that could not properly identify their targets due to the bad bear and the mist that was blurring their view and became a hindrance to performing well.How Was it Managed? The group that was supposed to identify the targets in the mock target attack mission, advised the other group about the weather situation. However, when they persisted that targets should be identified, the assignment was not called off. The identifiers were asked to continue with their searching, wh ich they did but spent a lot of time due to the lack of clarity of vision causes by fog. However, when the strikers could not rightly strike their targets, they blamed the identifiers for wrongly identifying their targets and also spending a lot of time on searching for targets.I think the conflict was very often genuine and there were no personal reasons for this conflict. The conflict was substantive because the group that was supposed to locate the targets to be struck could not be identified due to external factors such as the weather. Another reason whitethorn also have been the location of the ship where the fog was more and the targets were not visible. There was no negative impact on the goal growth of the organisation or even the personal/ working relationships between the two groups.Since this was a mock assignment thats aim was to train the sweet recruits in the navy to properly identify and aim their targets. In my view, the weather condition provided a flavor of the real target attack missions face by the navy. The goal of this assignment would have been achieved if both the groups became experts in their tasks in variable whether conditions. However, expertise comes with practice and experience. Hence, I think this assignment and conflict was the first step towards attaining the goal.Even though this conflict arose out of a blame game for the two groups, one blaming the weather and the other blaming the first group, the argument was purely professional and not personal. There was a heated up debate between the two groups, but this ended when the officers arrived after a few(prenominal) minutes to give their remarks. After both the groups had presented their points of view to the officers, they were told that it was a part of the navy life and the navy assignments and no particular group was to be blamed for the failure to aim the target properly. Hence, this argument did not arrive any hard feelings between the groups.