Saturday, March 23, 2019
Change in Massachusetts Politics Essay -- Massachusetts Politics Gover
Change in Massachu come outts political scienceMassachusetts has always been known for its politics. From the eld of legerdemain Hancock and John Adams to the Kennedy Compound and failed Dukakis presidential campaign, the Bay pronounce is, has been, and always will be a hotbed of political activism. But that does not mean that Massachusetts has a vibrant two party system.If anything can be said closely Massachusetts, it is that the rural area and its voters are for certain lop-sided towards one party. Massachusetts currently has Democrats make full all of their US House and US Senate Seats, as well as a 138 of 160 State House seats, and 33 of 40 State Senate seats. The precisely state-wide office held not held by the Democrats is the Governors seat, which is set to be widely contested next year with 7 candidates line drive up to face incumbent acting Gov. Jane Swift.In the old days however, the story wasnt exactly the same. For practically every year forwards 1928, Massach usetts overwhelming voted Republican. In fact, the first Republican floor draw in the US Senate was Henry Cabot Lodge, Sr., from Massachusetts. Many of the famous Massachusetts politicians that move up to power in the beginning world war two were Republicans, including President Calvin Coolidge, who before moving on to Vice President and President, was the Governor of Massachusetts.Somewhat like todays climate in the state, Massachusetts at that era was also dominated by one party. It just happened to be the Republicans rather than the Democrats. Before Franklin Roosevelt, the Democrats were largely the party of the Southern whites farmers who were ideologically different than the northerly white businessmen that dominated politics and voted largely Republican.It is the party switching that is the most interesting and the most available to analyzing. There most certainly was a switch somewhere between the roaring twenties and the colossal depression, but it not necessarily ha d everything to do with the money in heaps pockets. The reasons for it are to be further explained.The Industrial Revolution in MassachusettsIn Massachusetts during the 1880s and 1890s, as in roughly every other part of the country, immigrants were arriving at unprecedented levels. Especially in Boston, but in other communities like Lowell, Brockton, Worcester, and Springfield, the demographic of people was slowly ... ...once in 1984 during a campaign in which he lost only one state. Especially evident was in 1972, when Massachusetts was the only state in the nation that did not vote for Nixon in his re-election bid. That vote prompted the take overt Blame Me, Im from Massachusetts bumper sticker that bland puts a grin on Bay Staters faces today.Conclusion Massachusetts, A requisite to be uniqueSince the Great Depression, the entire nation has been much more(prenominal) supportive of Democrats than they previously were. Most of that support can be attributed to Roosevelts sp ick-and-span Deal, and the ineffectiveness of Hoovers Republican strategies.In Massachusetts, however, at that place has always been a different reason for doing things. This was no different. While the deliverance may have played a major role, Massachusetts lurch was evident before the true start of the depression.Similar changes happened in New York, Rhode Island, and other industrial states. However, Massachusetts has always prided themselves on being a leader and an innovator, and as proved by the analysis into the elections of the 20s and 30s, it is evident that this major swing in political beliefs was no different.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment