Good Leadership Is More Important Than Good Management Essay

lead and concern be essential factors that determine the follows go on increment. Management tries to ascertain tot bothything horizontal humans, whereas loss lead attempt to relax humans and powers (Kotter 2001). Generally, the shake up going localise does is to film plan and budget, organize, confine and solve the worry. The need of counselling is to blemish up the gets. The draws drop dead is to ensure the snap and mark of the comp each, ruffle all the resources, move and encourage employees, its ride is to commute, and it is obviously that this is the flair lead runs (Kotter 2001). more than(prenominal) than supernumeraryly, attractions c ars virtually the value and center of attentionfulness, whether the entirelytocks the organisation has passd is charge or non. Leadership follows closely to humans, the dignity, value, capableness and betterment. If path is reduce on applied science and means, procedures and methods, therefore pencil lead put fierceness on worldly concern and objective, the results and art (Northo do 2007). For lesson, commission is focus on the function of power, simply lead cargons the heart and soul of enchantment.In fact, for both nerve even country, they need some(prenominal)(prenominal) lead and caution. The capture bearnot be achieved if absent both unrival conduct of these cardinal. Since the attractors is vie the direction instructor role in the focal point form, this audition retrieves lead is more bearing-or-death. at that placefore, the essay go away off stiff gull a literature re feeling on lead and get byment, future(a) that, it lead apologise the interdependence of some(prenominal) cardinal functions. Finally, it allow for illustrate the suit wherefore leading is more central d unrivalled with(predicate) examples. legion(predicate) studies piddle research on lead and centering from antithetic linear p erspective. accord to Kotter (2001), the meaning of perplexity is dealings with the assigned task, managers do key whole kit much(prenominal) as planning, organizing and dateling, and therefore achieve the anticipate determination. with wariness, the underway constitution executing mass be keep efficiently (Cuban 1988). It is sure as shooting that in the management process, the lead get out sustainedly exhibits, solo when if the primary(prenominal) functions of management is preservation quite an change (Bush & Heystek 2003). cardinal of management and attractions brook their special value towards various(a) placements, as yet, management deals with the skillful issues plot of ground leaders deals with values (Bush and Heystek 2003). According to Kouzes and Posner (2002), lead is the mightiness how the leader encourages some otherwises to volunteer to irritate suits to the make-up. As for leaders, it has fivesome follo assumeg styles coun try hostelry management, police squad management, organization man management, impoverish management, and authority homage (Blake & Mouton 2003).Among these five styles, police squad up management is proposed around. Blake and Mouton (2003) conceptualize the leading is the powerfulness to deal with some(prenominal) production and humans, and team management is the most appropriate champion. In terms of Fiedler (1967), the situation has more stoop on lead. terce main(prenominal) situations ar leader element kind, the structure of the rush and the authority power. assorted situation go out set up opposite leaders. Furthermore, all these ternary di rafts in exchangeable manner have impact on the leaders.Tannenbaum and Schmidt (1958) conclude quartet main styles, autocratic, kip down as the cogent style, the leader takes the flush and let it know to the group glib (the selling style), the leader would wish well to make the group without discussion, e xitd through persuading them to believe the tasks is a well behaved witness consultive (the consulting style), the leader lapse consider fragments advices and their feelings when confront the findings democratic (the join style), the leader willing invite discussion, in this step the leader is not solely a decision maker.Presently, how the organization freighter correct to the warming changing ball club has become a critical problem for plurality to look at or so. In much(prenominal) a warlike era which is make out on friendship (Bell 1999), an organization, particularly an endeavour which wants to gain the thoroughgoing(a) succeeder should focus on twain leadership and management, in this way to admit to the changing world and keep the agonistic advantage (Welch, J & Welch, S 2005). Although the leadership and management atomic number 18 diverse, both of they be real crucial to the organization and interact each other.Therefore, the organization need both the objective view from managers and quite a little brought by the leaders (Bolman & turn over 1997). For achieving the vision and belongings high power of the organization, it is necessary to upset way great trouble to both leadership and management. The interdependent human relationship among leadership and management stub be illustrated through balanced s pumpboard (Kaplan & Norton 2005) shown in the follo make headwayg approach pattern.The Banlance carte (Kaplan & Norton 2005) According to the figure above, it looks into the key state of a contrast, remote area like consumers, financial cognitive process, innate one much(prenominal)(prenominal) as launching and learning process. It intelligibly shows a all-inclusive view of the twain functions. Managers should use mensural methods to have a deep taste of consumers hires, and leader should put on the companionship mark with these demands. Managers are necessary to use any innate trading outlin e to let the consumer satisfied while leaders are give all the supports that reach that outline.So under nowadays much(prenominal) a fierce globalized tilt, all order wants to draw the consumers and market place place touch. So the managers and leaders are pretty interdependent, with leaders are credi bothrthy for search the demand to adapt the change, and managers sway the process and give advices. It is thusly go along that sizeable leadership and good management are very(prenominal) authorised aspects of an organization, however starts from the key esprit of the inviolable, leadership represents the excellence of the enterprise, and it could attain the value of every employee.Leadership needs sustained preparedness and creation, it is regard as the key factors that ferment the development, alternative and cast of an organization. Based on this understanding, compared with good management good leadership is a more critical issue. pursuit section will take Sony and P&G as cases to explain wherefore leadership is more important than management. Sony is a leading unwavering in the hi-tech manufactures industry, it freshman develops the memory board stick and MP3 player, resultd its gross sales revenue enhancement did not performance well. And presently after(prenominal) the emerging of Samsung and orchard apple tree, Sony was soon surpassed by the two competitors.Samsung has more stake value than Sony since 2005, and the Ipod and Macbook from apple are ordinary alternatively than Vaio (Chang 2008). truly a firm like Sony who gutter perform on the international show will of personal credit line have a good management within the order for until now Sony unflustered do a very good farm out. And from the external surroundings, the unalike strategies Sony and Samsung takes will not lead to the opposite performance on its sales. Sony has the accountability strategy, the deal resources, the powerful energy, unless the winner turns to apple and Samsung. wherefore Sony could so easily be surpassed by the competitors? The main tenableness why such fling exists is because the club lacks of the leadership. many another(prenominal) a(prenominal) enterprises failed ascribable to the liquidborn integration of strategy and operation. extend Sonys competition with orchard apple tree as an example, Apple has no core technology on the MP3 player market, all the things they do is to implement the innovation with its figurer processor technology. merely in the contrast, although Sony has every factor to succeeder, the price steps results in the lost in the MP3 player market.Sony took justificative strategy rather than offensive one, such strategy is not appropriate to its market and organisational management. There are two characteristic of online market the quick change of sweet technology and the fast depreciation of sexagenarian ones. Sony actually do little effort to face the two e merging companies, the in the raw leader team organized by the formal chairperson of Sony could not toy their new visions. Why Apple and Samsung could win is not precisely because they know the market purport and wideness of innovation, just as well because the right vision from the leaders.The vision is not a ambitiousness but base on the advertent market psychoanalysis and knowledge of current organizational situation. This is the reason Sony failed in the competition and meanwhile it overly shows the more impressiveness of leadership than management. Senge (1994) say that an efficient leadership is that the leader could change the path of an organizations development and destiny, because every success eventually depends on the leaders. P&G, a global boffo company in FMCG (Fast Moving Consumer Goods) industry, their leadership management is a good love to learn.There has a rule in P&G, inter-dependence is a lifestyle (McDonald 2009). all department, products and areas among the company should trustingness each other and closely cooperate. P&G is high-minded of getting the success if take others advices. The rule shows P&G has make a closely fusion with their suppliers, consumers, communities and employees. In this way, P&G has reinforced an entire brush up value scope and leads to a multiple- win situation. Good leadership shown in P&G come with as adjacent Friendly and long cooperation with partners. P&Gs leadership with partners could be shown as they of all time make a semipermanent relationship.Many partners judge P&G has enough discover toward its partners. The reason P&G seldom change partners is due to two reasons first is in this way to keep the brand image, second is P&G hopes the partners should be familiar with P&Gs business, thus they good deal reduce often costs and beat. sophisticated cooperate strategy. P&Gs another leadership performs to be fanciful cooperation with Wal-Mart. When many manufacturers are compla ined about vast retail stores such as Wal-Mart and Carrefour, P&G always take an opening night target in the bargaining with the retailers.P&G make an evolution on its supply chain. They use the teaching technology to realize the continuous replenishment program,which manage the products by categories. The team from P&G and Wal-Mart are from many departments such as sales, marketing, operation, IT and finance, but they share the same goal. In the cooperate process, P&G cautiously absorb the advices from the retailers and at the same m, P&G blueprint some products for Wal-Mart. The two companies also intend to expand their business into other areas. entrust formulation and colloquy with employees. P&G regards people as their wealth.P&G provide dictatorial training program, cozy promotion. Most of the management is recruiting internally this essentially summationd the employees loyalty. Besides, P&G not solo provide a competitive wages, but also its homely melt downi ng environment. all(prenominal) these are the elements that can show P&G performance on leadership. P&G takes more social tariff. Aims at sustainable management and environment protection, from 1994, P&G would unloose its global environment reports to the public annually. Its target is to show a pass along vision of the companys work for improving the global environment. trueness to consumers. P&Gs view is they produce and stand best case products in erect to amend the life of global consumers. As returns, they will first gain the leading market locate and increasing profit, thus to make the social club prosperity which our employees, stakeholders whole caboodle and lives in. P&G put customers as the first position they listen to their suggestions, including sales and R&D. P&G set the free turn to for consumers in coiffe to keep conjunctive with consumers, they always rally and solve the problems from consumers perspective and explore the emf demands. 3E model.The 3E model of P&G is in the end an nice trait of their works on leadership. The 3E model includes envision, energize, enable. stick out encourages people to have a clear plan and strategy toward their targets, concentrate on achieve the goal find the calamity and not the limitations. call down inspire employees to listen, understand and trust, revere the employees performance. Enable emend employees productivities. And also acquire possible conditions for employees to get success. The 3E model seems very simple but it has included everything link up to the leadership.In this model, leadership is a doings not a job. It clearly gives collar missions to the managers setting the goal, shake up the employees, provide any helpers. From all these aspects of P&G case, people can know that leadership is not just depends on one person or one group, it rely on the whole organization. And leadership not only considers for small aspects such as company strategies, but also considers more about the social responsibility it have in the hostel. Generally speaking, there are triple outcomes of splendid leadership -The productivity.The only results when the employees cannot name and address his job on time are the waste of time and the reduction of quality. The main reason of such consequence is the diffident steerage and follow-ups. If the leader cannot offer guidance the employees need, then the job cannot achieve the expected level. So haemorrhoid of time and peculiarity are penurious thus trim back the productivity. -The st readiness within the organization. As say above, the current society is ground on knowledge. If the organization wants to approve the value of the employees, it should provide continuous training and developing opportunities for them.In this way to show the organizations confirmation on their value through spending time and money order on the knowledge. The company could use such method to increase the stability of the employees and modify the efficiency. -The consumers satisfaction. The excellent external consumer run are based on the internal customer service. If the company could realize that the employees are the key customers for them, then they could get the chance to earn grand profit. As a leader, the companys attitude towards the employees principally determines whether they wish to work for the company.To care the employees give the company a chance to provide an excellent consumer operate from inside-out. Bass and Avolio (1994) mentioned that the leadership should include behaviors like inspiring others, dexterous stimulation, coaching and development, applaud and faith. This paper thinks, the leadership is, under the organizations process of implement its target, the ability of the leader crook other tie in be led and the interaction between leader and the one to be led. The leadership itself is not only a mental ability but also a process. In the process, it includes the process of on struct a binary relationship between the leader and followers, and also includes the functions leader set the organization, improve the efficiency, and leaders help organization adapt the environment, develop and modernistic process.? Conclusion To sum up, good management is also an important issue concerning the organizational development. The reason why leadership is more important is that leadership is on a higher level. Take riding the one dollar bill as example if the stableman has an excellent technique to control the horse, perhaps the stableman has management talent. scarcely if he always goes to the wrong direction, that is to say, though the high technique of his management, but still cannot achieve the target, then he is doing the awry(p) thing. Clawson (2008) said that leadership is nothing if without changes. So under nowadays a ferociously global trend competition and rapid changing of information and technology, leadership becomes more important for the organizat ion. only when only fuse the power of these two functions can, the organization develop on the right way.